But nowadays it seems people no longer feel remorse for mismanaging their financial debts that they are taken to courts by their creditors for defaulting their loan repayments. It has become acceptable even fashionable to become bankrupts. These people are also morally bankrupt and this, may I add, precedes financial bankruptcy. Has they been responsible and upright they would be careful not to bite more than they can chew. To such, taking away money borrowed and not making timely repayments is a repugnant act of abuse of trust. While there are honest bankrupts, by whom I mean those who couldn't help it and are declared due to business failures caused by unforeseen circumstances, there are now more and more people who consider it not wrong to become bankrupts. On top of it they are even proud and feel no loss in social status when they are made to be bankrupt. They consider it a convenient way to become irresponsible and couldn't be bothered what the world think of them.
But this is not my concern. My neighbor being a bankrupt, say, has no effect upon me, apart from perhaps a likelihood of being occasionally disturbed to give him money. But it is both a worry and an angry and annoying reaction should my government becomes insolvent. A nice word to explain an inability to repay its debts. Governments will not become bankrupt but they will take the citizens towards hard times. Currencies will devalue, cost of living spiral, crime rates go up, the people becomes disenchanted with their lives and the general mood of the nation turns negative. There will be stronger tendencies of citizen protests and at the very worst, the government will be overthrown with strong possibilities of injuries and bloodshed, even deaths.
Now being in debt is not wrong. All of us at one time or another owe either the bank or someone money we borrowed for a purpose, typically to buy a house or a car, or for those venturing out, to start a business. But we would over the years painstakingly pay off our debts with interest to honor what trust the lenders had in us. The problem with borrowing is often the attitude that we use the money to gamble, money that doesn't belong to us, so if the gamble fails, well, to deal with the consequence as it arise. In other words, borrowers consider being in debt as an opportunistic venture and lenders abetted them in the hope that they succeed so both parties can win. But we have seen how financial institutions collapsed when borrowers could not repay their installments due to economic recessions, job loss or over exposure of their assets which then are taken over to be auctioned to recover the debt. And lately several governments have chosen to risk the future of their citizens by undertaking risky investments that give them opportunities to receive bribes. Trust in government has reached very low which explains why so many countries change governments as often as diapers. They are lucky to have democratic process in place with constitutionally upright police, military and judiciary to check on the excesses of the ruling parties and bring them to court to be charged, jailed and even executed. But some are in precarious state where these check and balance machinery instead abet the offenders, even the anti corruption agency supposedly to prosecute the guilty persons lack any bite to do anything.
I won't mention names but we don't have a system in which citizen concerns are seriously and fairly addressed and acted upon. Such a system will quickly accelerate the decline of the nation. I've never lived in a worse administration where abuses are blatantly protected. When the heads set such examples how can we expect the subordinates to do otherwise? There is a bad vibe in the air. Electricity tariff will be increased soon as gasoline had recently. What follow will be increases of related costs on food, services and essential goods. The government had served notice - come April 2015 the public will be taxed on what they consume. The GST will become a new burden without an adjusted reduction in personal tax for the ordinary folks. The GST will be another way to collect more taxes and the prime minister cleverly tells gullible citizens that paying them means patriotism. How stupid an argument can this be? Even a kid can tell you that it means the government is a poor manager of public funds and all the taxes it collect over the years to have to resort to squeezing more.
Tax is dirty but if well spent to bring welfare to the general public it will not be burdensome. But to force more taxes while the politicians raise their own salaries and live grandiose lifestyles, you be the judge if the prime minister is believable and credible. The path he leads the nation down is the path he laid, and he alone will be held responsible for the outcome of our future.